traditional
Nature Grace Dualism (Part 2)
Nature Grace Dualism Part 1 Nature Grace Dualism Part 2 The presence of nature grace dualism throughout Roman Catholicism has resulted in a host of worries. Goldsworthy quotes Vittorio Subilia’s observation that Roman Catholicism is marked by “a phenomenon of complexio oppositorum.” The claim is an historical one supported by the evidence of Roman Catholic [...]
WCF, LBC, and TAG
A friend pointed me toward this post by Brandon Adams. From what I can tell Brandon is influenced a good bit by Gordon H. Clark and argues in his post that Van Tillian presuppositionalism and specifically TAG is inconsistent with the WCF and LBC. While I am not one to excitedly engage in the Van [...]
Apologetics and the Arminian
The purpose of this post is to address a response to the above presentation, wherein presuppositional apologetics seems to be misunderstood by the author. The author’s response can be found here, but I will address most of the post, if not all, in the following article. James White recently argued for presuppositional apologetics and against [...]
Norman Geisler and Moral Relativism
Cross posted. “Ethics deals with what is morally right and wrong. Christian Ethics deals with what is morally right and wrong for a Christian.” Norman Geisler. Christian Ethics: Options and Issues. Grand Rapids, MI. Baker Academic, 1989. Pg. 17. (All quotations and paraphrases in this post are from this source.) Let’s step carefully through Dr. [...]
Paul Manata Reviews Michael Sudduth’s "The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology"
Paul Manata has written another one of his excellent reviews. Though I have already read the book, I have been hoping that he would review Michael Sudduth’s The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology and Manata has not disappointed. The book is rather expensive and has much to say that many of those who object to [...]
Covenantal Apologetics and Other Religions
Introduction Nick Norelli recently wrote: “I think the thing is that plenty of presuppositionalists debate (look at James White who debates like every other day) and I’m sure they employ their method, but I think it lends itself to certain subjects better than others. For example, when I reviewed Gary Demar’s book on Bahnsen’s apologetic [...]
The things you find while not looking for them…
“NB that choosing hats errantly supposes that by rational Bahnsen means deductive. But anyone with even a modicum of familiarity with Bahnsen and Van Til would know that both of them considered induction rational.” – Mark Someone taking shots at me and my understanding of Bahnsen from afar as it were recently made the claim [...]
"Silly" Arguments
The attempts of liberals to interpret Scripture according to their own would-be autonomous categories have always struck me as exercises in futility due to the admission that they have already rejected Scripture anyway. The lengths to which people will go in an attempt to justify sin in themselves and in others are rather incredible. One [...]
Did the Fathers Know the Gospel?
T4G 2010 — Session 7 — Ligon Duncan from Together for the Gospel (T4G) on Vimeo. Recommended Texts: The Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts and English Translations (Hardcover) - Michael W. Holmes Early Christian Doctrines: Revised Edition – J. N. D. Kelly Holy Scripture: The Ground and Pillar of our Faith – 3 Vol set by [...]
A Response To Mark
“It is no wonder that the critic has a problem making up his mind about hats and the RazorsKiss does not appear to be razor sharp.” – Mark “They [Mr. Di Giacomo's posts] are thorough, clear, correct and easily understood. At least if one is willing to wipe the tears away and quit whining. [...]
© 2010 Choosing Hats. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Wordpress. Designed by 
Recent Comments