<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Choosing Hats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.choosinghats.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.choosinghats.com</link>
	<description>Biblical Apologetics to the Glory of God</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 01:07:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Praxis Presup: Episode 2 by RazorsKiss</title>
		<link>http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1124#comment-1833</link>
		<dc:creator>RazorsKiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 01:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1124#comment-1833</guid>
		<description>Fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Praxis Presup: Episode 2 by RazorsKiss</title>
		<link>http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1124#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>RazorsKiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 04:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1124#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll fix it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Praxis Presup: Episode 2 by C.L. Bolt</title>
		<link>http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1124#comment-1829</link>
		<dc:creator>C.L. Bolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1124#comment-1829</guid>
		<description>Thanks Stephen. Hopefully the &quot;powers that be&quot; can fix that for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stephen. Hopefully the &#8220;powers that be&#8221; can fix that for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Praxis Presup: Episode 2 by Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1124#comment-1828</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1124#comment-1828</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t seem that the link for this is working anymore.  Could you please double-check it?  I&#039;d love to give it a listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t seem that the link for this is working anymore.  Could you please double-check it?  I&#8217;d love to give it a listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Theology Matters: The Doctrine of God by Tweets that mention Theology Matters: The Doctrine of God &#124; Choosing Hats -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1463#comment-1827</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Theology Matters: The Doctrine of God &#124; Choosing Hats -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1463#comment-1827</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mark Lamprecht, Joshua Whipps. Joshua Whipps said: Theology Matters: The Doctrine of God: &quot;Naturally in the system of theology and in apologetics the doctrine of God... http://bit.ly/bybT0Y [...]

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#039;s server IP (208.74.66.43) doesn&#039;t match the comment&#039;s URL host IP (74.112.128.10) and so is spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mark Lamprecht, Joshua Whipps. Joshua Whipps said: Theology Matters: The Doctrine of God: &quot;Naturally in the system of theology and in apologetics the doctrine of God&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/bybT0Y" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bybT0Y</a> [...]</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#8217;s server IP (208.74.66.43) doesn&#8217;t match the comment&#8217;s URL host IP (74.112.128.10) and so is spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clarification On Self-Deception by Tweets that mention Clarification On Self-Deception &#124; Choosing Hats -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1461#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Clarification On Self-Deception &#124; Choosing Hats -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1461#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by UFO Jim, Joshua Whipps. Joshua Whipps said: Clarification On Self-Deception: In my debate with Ben Wallis I answered the following in response to a series of ... http://bit.ly/9NkTo5 [...]

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#039;s server IP (208.74.66.43) doesn&#039;t match the comment&#039;s URL host IP (74.112.128.10) and so is spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by UFO Jim, Joshua Whipps. Joshua Whipps said: Clarification On Self-Deception: In my debate with Ben Wallis I answered the following in response to a series of &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/9NkTo5" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9NkTo5</a> [...]</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#8217;s server IP (208.74.66.43) doesn&#8217;t match the comment&#8217;s URL host IP (74.112.128.10) and so is spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clarification On Self-Deception by Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1461#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1461#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Thanks for responding to my post!  It was a pleasure to work with you for our debate, and I have enjoyed our blogging correspondence, as well.  However, I just have a few follow-up comments of my own to add:

Firstly, I&#039;m sorry that I mischaracterized your response to my question about the difference between the sort of belief I deny and that which you attribute to me.  I try to always interpret my opponents charitably, and, in this case, that meant supposing your response addressed my query directly.  However, my point remains that there seems to be no substantive difference between the belief of which each of us spoke.  I want both you and our audience to appreciate that.  As I mentioned in my last post, there is no deeper, ingrained belief at issue, here.  All we have is the ordinary belief we talk about in natural language.

Secondly, please don&#039;t mistake my previous message for an attempted argument against the existence of God---or anything else, for that matter.  I was merely voicing a few observations intended for your benefit.  In other words, there was no opportunity for me to employ a fallacy, because I didn&#039;t even present an argument!

Finally, I&#039;m sorry you don&#039;t agree that my observations have relevance to your religious doctrines.  (Also, without going into too much detail, I should remind you that denying them doesn&#039;t make me a strong atheist.)  I had hoped that they might help you along to seeing what I think are errors in your position; then again, perhaps they may yet, as you consider them over the long-term.  Whatever happens, though, I am glad we have shared our perspectives on the matter.

Take care,
--Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Thanks for responding to my post!  It was a pleasure to work with you for our debate, and I have enjoyed our blogging correspondence, as well.  However, I just have a few follow-up comments of my own to add:</p>
<p>Firstly, I&#8217;m sorry that I mischaracterized your response to my question about the difference between the sort of belief I deny and that which you attribute to me.  I try to always interpret my opponents charitably, and, in this case, that meant supposing your response addressed my query directly.  However, my point remains that there seems to be no substantive difference between the belief of which each of us spoke.  I want both you and our audience to appreciate that.  As I mentioned in my last post, there is no deeper, ingrained belief at issue, here.  All we have is the ordinary belief we talk about in natural language.</p>
<p>Secondly, please don&#8217;t mistake my previous message for an attempted argument against the existence of God&#8212;or anything else, for that matter.  I was merely voicing a few observations intended for your benefit.  In other words, there was no opportunity for me to employ a fallacy, because I didn&#8217;t even present an argument!</p>
<p>Finally, I&#8217;m sorry you don&#8217;t agree that my observations have relevance to your religious doctrines.  (Also, without going into too much detail, I should remind you that denying them doesn&#8217;t make me a strong atheist.)  I had hoped that they might help you along to seeing what I think are errors in your position; then again, perhaps they may yet, as you consider them over the long-term.  Whatever happens, though, I am glad we have shared our perspectives on the matter.</p>
<p>Take care,<br />
&#8211;Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Refusing Antithetical Assumptions by Friday Favorites &#124; September 03 &#124; 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1459#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Favorites &#124; September 03 &#124; 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1459#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>[...] Refusing Antithetical Assumptions &#8211; Chris briefly explains that God is knowable and the atheist knows Him.    Please share: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Refusing Antithetical Assumptions &#8211; Chris briefly explains that God is knowable and the atheist knows Him.    Please share: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guest Blog &#8211; Are You Rapture-Ready? (Response to a Harold Camping Tract) by lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1442#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1442#comment-1820</guid>
		<description>Harold camping of family radio is connected to bill gates internet. google bill gates is in the anti christ nutlore archives</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harold camping of family radio is connected to bill gates internet. google bill gates is in the anti christ nutlore archives</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Praxis Presup: Episode 4 by Mike Felker</title>
		<link>http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1454#comment-1819</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Felker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choosinghats.com/?p=1454#comment-1819</guid>
		<description>Are these shows available via podcast?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these shows available via podcast?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
