Archive for 'BK'
Was Van Til A Philosopher?

Was Van Til A Philosopher?

Posted 23 May 2010 | By BK | Categories: BK | 61 Comments

In response to a recent post on this site, our good friend Mitch from Urban Philosophy made the following comment:
One can grant that Van Til was a philosopher, but they need not grant that he was a competent philosopher.
A few comments later, Pierre-Simon Laplace shared with us his own perspective on Van Til’s [...]

Resources on iTunes U

Resources on iTunes U

Posted 13 February 2010 | By BK | Categories: BK | No Comments

I was recently impressed with the wealth of information available on iTunes University. One set of courses that caught my attention in particular (and that I am currently listening to) is a 3-part series on Systematic Theology, taught by Dr. Douglas F. Kelly from RTS. I have provided links below for those who [...]

Where’s the Data?

Posted 05 January 2010 | By BK | Categories: BK | 1 Comment

Although I don’t spend as much time in apologetic discussions as I used to, I do, on rare occasions, find the time to have a short conversation here and there. One recent encounter I had provided me with a text book example of the potential problem with making self-referencing universal statements; that is, statements [...]

When I Use a Word …

When I Use a Word …

Posted 20 November 2009 | By BK | Categories: BK, Uncategorized | No Comments

‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less.’
‘The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’
‘The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master – that’s all.’

For those of you who [...]

Falling Down

Falling Down

Posted 05 November 2009 | By BK | Categories: BK, Uncategorized | 4 Comments

A section of the ongoing discussion between Chris the evil Presuppositionlist (inside joke, sorry) and Mitch over at Urban Philosophy caught my attention today.  It is a section that discusses the concept of “common ground” between believer and unbeliever by using the analogy of gravity.  Here is the entirety of what Mitch stated caught my [...]

Faith and God’s Glory

Faith and God’s Glory

Posted 14 October 2009 | By BK | Categories: BK | No Comments

I was reading a Tweet from John Piper today and wanted to share this article that he referenced, that was transcribed from a sermon preached in 1999. It is a great analogy as to how our faith in God makes him look good (i.e. gives him glory).
The article can be found here
Your daddy is [...]

Can the Bible Be Understood … or Not?

Can the Bible Be Understood … or Not?

Posted 08 October 2009 | By BK | Categories: BK | No Comments

It never ceases to amaze me when individuals argue that a Christian’s interpretation of the Bible is subjective (and therefore dubious) while simultaneously appealing to their own interpretation as being correct in order to make their argument. Case in point:
Atheist: So, you are wrong, because there are many other Christian churches besides the odd [...]

A Collision is Coming

A Collision is Coming

Posted 07 October 2009 | By BK | Categories: BK | 1 Comment

Atheist Christopher Hitchens (”God is not Good”) and Christian Doug Wilson (”Letter From a Christian Citizen”) have been on tour for the past year holding a series of debates and public appearances that have eventually led to the production of the film “Collision”. The film is due to be released October 27, 2009 and [...]

Nothing is Absolute

Posted 26 September 2009 | By BK | Categories: BK | No Comments

I was checking in on some discussion boards I used to post regularly on and came across the following statement by an atheist in response to a discussion over the Bible:
Atheist: All interpretation of the bible is subjective. You don’t hold the final word on it. It’s all in your own mind and isn’t absolute. [...]

Pragmatism vs Justification

Posted 23 September 2009 | By BK | Categories: BK | 3 Comments

I have been following the discussion on Induction between Chris and Mitch with great interest. Even though they are about to wrap things up, I wanted to comment on part of Mitch’s most recent response.
Mitch writes: It might not be a justification of induction in Bolt’s opinion, but such is the nature of pragmatism. [...]